Celebrities – Here's Randi Rhodes putting a few things together about the causes of the fires through some kind of mental operation, but I'm not sure it's addition. She suspects it is terrorism, but you'll never guess who the terrorists might be.
That fall Rhodes took must have been worse than I thought. Either that, or she's still hitting the bottle.
Breaking news flash. It is being reported that Randi Rhodes was attacked by 14 members of the Ketel gang and one member of the Bloody Marys
Was it the Ketel and Bloody Marys that started the fires?
Out here in San Diego when we had to evac out of here, we turned to local talk radio stations for info on who, where, where to go and road/traffic routes to take. There was 1 local radio station that didn't even cover the fire at all! that was KLSD 1360 (K- LSD, this explains a lot) the AirAmerica station!
They were groveling for cash to keep the station on the air!
Everybody wants in on the spin game... first, Fox, now Air America... wait for the EVIDENCE!
BOTH of the extremes play the same games. Both try to outdo each other. Tit for tat...
Did you read the transcript of what she said or does that not matter to you?
It's like O.J. telling everyone he killed his wife and then you wanting to wait for the evidence.
Well, certainly this is as accurate as Fox´s insinuations about AlQaeda...what will the big fat liar have to say about this, I wonder.
Anyone who has ever lived in Southern California knows that arson is one of the first suspects when forest fires explode,in the past some have been set by firefighters and many are a result of careless citizens.
Blackwater or AlQaeda,you decide,one thing for sure we will never know because either way,if this proves to be terrorism, the release of the facts would not be of benefit to the Bush Administartion.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
elliotthicks1965
getbackerzoo
nopatacious
gabriel19671968
soulkeeper009
adamhowe1980
MacBookForMe
slashup67
2jojoyo
harleyb761960
IZasPIE
ind06
willcoop
whatsnews9
universal12
cherev
RedRiverJ
Porisa
Vitov
alkateso
zephyr_ali
grumblingsanta
GHOSTWHOWALKS
Helixbuilder
dexlovex2
vettenut
cptnkrk
abd1977
icono1
mamasan
KobraJeedai
BJTJ
Obaku
gamahuche
ranchhand
rappin4tay
tanglang
Raiderwall
Wolfie2007
rebner
dondukdun
www.sugar-shoes.co.uk
bugluver
comeon
Toriup
birddog54
mdvaldosta
aniokly
avpd85
werebu
88)
Vote
Is there any better example of a Barking Moonbat?
Perhaps her recent "mugging" by a piece of NYC sidewalk just outside of a watering hole is also involved.
Ann Coulter...
Ann Coulter has less conspiracy, more humor and more teeth.
No, Ann Coulter has different conspiracies, talks more hatefully, and looks more emaciated.
Seldom hear of Rhodes causing a stir by her latest "pronouncement", she doesn't make a living writing "Treason", "Godless", etc., and at least she doesn't look skeletal.
Oh, and Birddog, loved your driveby negative on the Deathray story... class act!
"she doesn't make a living writing "Treason", "Godless""
That's because she doesn't have the talent. Coulter says a lot of outrageous and mean things that I don't agree with but she also is sharp and has a gift for one liners. That's why she sells millions of books and Rhodes works for a bankrupt radio network.
If I were in Rhodes position, i'd probably be drinking heavily too.
Yeah, old Annie does say a lot of outrageous and mean things... and you wonder WHY the dialogue over politics is so polarized? But of course, she's on YOUR side, so you give her a pass and support her...
As I said below... EVIDENCE. But that doesn't serve the extremists on either end.
"and you wonder WHY the dialogue over politics is so polarized?"
Not really Donnaich, see this article is about what Randi Roads has claimed. And even this would not be news except for her claim 2 weeks ago that she was attacked by right wing extremist as a cover for her own blackout drunk episode in a long line of episodes.
You brought up Ann Coulter as an attempt to change the subject, that is what is known as "polarizing"
I brought her up to point out there are "moonbats" on both sides of the issue... which BoBo finally admitted "Coulter says a lot of outrageous and mean things that I don't agree with..." If you want to criticize one, but let the other slide, you perpetuate the entire process.
So, are you going to admit it, like BoBo... or continue it?
This from the master... see a lot of "sinks" in your participation, far more than I have.
Sometimes its not necessary to comment on stories you agree with, others are saying it far better than you could.
If you note, I didn't sink THIS story either. And I'm commenting.
Spin on, Darth!
"if you look past the front page and go to pages 3,4,5 ect. you will see almost every story has atleast 20 votes and 1 sink BUT NOT ONE SINGLE COMMENT."
Ya mean like this?
These are from Oct 24 07 Wed. (must have been a slow news day, S cal on fire ½ million people evacuated and such) All front page 1st # votes for 2nd # comments 3rd # hr/days post has been on.
US lacks labs to test for 'dirty bomb' 88 10 13 hr
Huge ash cloud as Indonesia's Mount Soputan erupts
88 7 12
Mesothelioma - What You Don't Know Can Kill You
88 2 22
Epic Games Creates Gears Of War PC Gold Edition
75 1 1day
The Science of Beauty
62 1 1 day
Amazing Projection Clock
61 1 23 hours ago
Gee, I didn't sink one of them... would have voted for the first one, by the way, we don't have enough "body counters" to screen people.
Never said any of those "drive bys" are right, either. Personally, if I don't like them, I just don't vote for 'em. Just ends up a major peeing contest.
Seldom hear of Rhodes causing a stir by her latest "pronouncement", she doesn't make a living writing "Treason", "Godless", etc., and at least she doesn't look skeletal.
Perhaps that's because she is functionally illiterate? Or drunk, it is hard to write when you're passed out.
Or maybe she just doesn't TRY to be as obnoxious? Simplest explanation, isn't it?