Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 158

• 0%

  eugenegerard1 year, 6 months ago

  Why are people so unwilling to look at this issue? Could it be the absolute horrors of the answers will disrupt entire belief systems. My God, we are not talking about a religion. We are talking about a crime that was done to each and every one of us. Therefore there should be no secrets and no cover-up. 911 was an inside job. BELIEVE your eyes.

  Reply

  41 Replies

  • 67%

    entropy1 year, 6 months ago

    Nicely said.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 71%

      eddie1071 year, 6 months ago

      The Heavens Gate Cult, had proof, and they firmly believed in what they suspected. And by the freedom of speech, they had the right to go out and firmly implant their ideas into the brains of anyone who would listen. To wallow in the ideas that they had concocted in their own brains, but some strange vision that they had at one time. "Evidence"

      Many people were led astray, and lost their lives because of people who excersized their free speech.

      I do not want free speech to be threatened, but I do applaud those who stand up and charge those who try to inflict America with destructive, implosive ideas that offer nothing but harm to the American community.

      "If the very act of asking is so destabilizing for people, than I have to wonder whether the fabric of our democracy is indeed so raveled it is beyond salvage,"

      There is a huge part of the problem, There is NO asking, the only things that fly out of her mouth, are definite accusations, not questions.

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 100%

        jimbrauner1 year, 6 months ago

        Researchers of great integrity have amassed undeniable evidence as follows.

        Professor David Ray Griffin is the nemesis of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory. In his latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin destroys the credibility of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Popular Mechanics reports, annihilates his critics, and proves himself to be a better scientist and engineer than the defenders of the official story.

        Griffin's book is 385 pages divided into four chapters and containing 1,209 footnotes. Without question, the book is the most thorough presentation and examination of all known facts about the 9/11 attacks. Griffin is a person who is sensitive to evidence, logic, and scientific reasoning. There is no counterpart on the official side of the story who is as fully informed on all aspects of the attacks as Griffin.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 80%

          eddie1071 year, 6 months ago

          The way a building falls is not evidence of anything, If there was true scientific, concrete evidence that could not easily be dismissed, there would have already been a trial and a public hanging. Your imagination has duped you again.

          Reply
    • 80%

      LordyLordy1 year, 6 months ago

      I agree:

      What started out as an embarrassment - ABC's hiring of Rosie O'Donnell - has turned into a disgrace. With each passing day, O'Donnell spews anti-American rhetoric which shows that she is not only a left-wing moonbat, but totally out of touch with reality.

      Can you get both Trump and Rosie into the same padded cell?

      Reply
  • 0%

    NoWayMan1 year, 6 months ago

    when you can't attack the message, attack the messenger instead. thats why there are so many personal attacks at rosie (her weight, she's a lesbian, whatever). people just don't want to deal.

    to this day I've wanted someone, anyone, to explain away the "put" options that were bought on Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter (they oppcupied 22 floors of the WTC) in the three days leading up to 911.

    Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter had 2,157 of its "put" options bought in the three trading days before 911.

    That's an average of 719 put options per day.

    Up until September 6, the average number of Morgan Stanley put options sold per day: 27

    thats a 26-fold increase.

    so someone knew in advance that Morgan Stanley's stock was going to fall.

    Reply

    9 Replies

    • 100%

      entropy1 year, 6 months ago

      Two words:

      Manhattan Project

      Involved thousands of scientists, engineers, and personnel. They took entire cities for research purposes.

      All kept secret.

      You guys really need to stop underestimating the governments power.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 80%

        torrent291 year, 6 months ago

        Two words:

        Different Time.

        Reply
    • 100%

      torrent291 year, 6 months ago

      So just how far back does this conspiracy stretch in your mind? Just how many people are involved in it?

      No people attack her because they are tired of pointing out the flaws in conspiracy theories. Flaws that are largely ignored by the cult of the 911 'truth'.

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 100%

        SamMyam1 year, 6 months ago

        name one.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 86%

          torrent291 year, 6 months ago

          Name one?

          How about the myth that WTC7 Collapsed without it damaging other buildings right?

          Exactly how did this occur then?

          http://www.buildings.com/Articles/detail.asp?ar...

          Reply
      • 100%

        jimbrauner1 year, 6 months ago

        The worst theory is the one Bush has foisted on us.

        Professor David Ray Griffin is the nemesis of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory. In his latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin destroys the credibility of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Popular Mechanics reports, annihilates his critics, and proves himself to be a better scientist and engineer than the defenders of the official story.

        Griffin's book is 385 pages divided into four chapters and containing 1,209 footnotes. Without question, the book is the most thorough presentation and examination of all known facts about the 9/11 attacks. Griffin is a person who is sensitive to evidence, logic, and scientific reasoning. There is no counterpart on the official side of the story who is as fully informed on all aspects of the attacks as Griffin.

        Reply
    • 100%

      redLineRunner1 year, 6 months ago

      Ok, I have to ask this. I cant believe Im letting myself get drawn into this debate again, but I have a question about your Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter point.

      How many of their employees were killed in the attacks? Are you implying that they knew of the attacks, and none of them showed up for work that day, knowing the attack would happen? Or did they cash in on this knowledge, only to die terrible deaths three days later, gaining nothing in the end?

      I have no problem with people asking questions. I do have a problem with people not accepting answers. For example, WTC 7, which people keep bringing up as proof - took damage to over 25% of its lower 18 floors. That, plus the extensive fire damage is enough to bring the building down.

      Ask questions, find the answers, and then move on.

      Reply
    • 0%

      protoham1 year, 6 months ago

      You just identified why Rosie is doing all this, she is a liberal and whatever she can blame on Republicans she will. It is part of the game.

      I am sure you can find all kinds of coincidences, just like Pearl Harbor to cover any theory you want.

      Reply
    • 100%

      mivan41 year, 6 months ago

      Osama Bin Laden or one of the many planners could have eaisly bought the puts and they could have let Their friends in on the Secret, In no way does that indicate Government involvement. I can buy puts anyone can. Options are tricky though, even you NoWay could have bought them.

      Hey it was you wasn't it. You bought those options didn't you

      You seem to know quite a bit about it, Come on you can tell us who your informant was!!!

      Reply
  • 0%

    GoldRush1 year, 6 months ago

    Many people have looked into this. Conspiracy buffs from around the world have joined together to suggest the craziest idea yet; The government of the U.S. assisted the terrorists in bringing down the towers. While nothing of this sort occurred, this view is more enticing to these type of people.

    The interesting aspect of this story is the effort her staff is trying to do in damage control. She is desperately seeking help. Her low self image and what might be "trouble" in her relationship is obvious. Rosie was not "seeking," she was "stating." The difference is clear: she was already convinced of the conspiracy and as she disclosed the information, the folks watching were stunned by her extraordinary view.

    Her distortions are extensions of a depressed mind and low esteem. She needs intervention. I hope she has one friend to help in a suicide watch over the next 90 days.

    Reply
  • 0%

    torrent291 year, 6 months ago

    Actually we are talking about a cult. The cult of the 911 "truthers"

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%

      entropy1 year, 6 months ago

      9/11 truthers are not a cult at all.

      Look up the word before you foolishly use it.

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 100%

        torrent291 year, 6 months ago

        1) Rigid belief system (check)

        2) Intense activism/aggressive proselytising (check)

        3) Advancing non-falsifiable propositions (check)

        4) Exclusivism (check)

        5) Leadership deification/elitist decision-making (check)

        6) Use of thought-terminating cliches (check)

        7) Bizarre beliefs/conspiracist mind-set (check)

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 100%

          pc251 year, 6 months ago

          well said

          Reply
  • 0%

    Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

    Why are people so unwilling to look at this issue? Let me count the ways:

    1) Engineering experts already explain how all the buildings came down and these reports were carried on all major networks plus CNN, MSNBC and Fox News with specials on The Discovery Channel and History Channels.

    Rosie: "Fire can't melt steal!"

    Every been to a blacksmith shop or steel mill? Heat is used to weaken and bend metal or even liguify it. This wasn't some simple office fire, it was a fire started by a major explosion then excelerated by jet fuel which burns much hotter and longer than any office furniture or paper.

    Rosie: "Building 7 couldn't implode without explosives placed inside!"

    The WTC complex was not built to withstand direct hits by jet airliners and then the colapse of the twin towers creating a downward rush of air and debri plus generating earthquake force tremors in neighboring buildings. That's why all the neighboring buildings were vacated.

    Reply

    16 Replies

    • 0%

      Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

      (Continuing)

      To say the gov't ran into building 7 with explosives to blow it up also implies that all the emeregency workers (police, fire, etc) were told to look the other way as they searched the building to vacate survivors and ignore it. Why hasn't even one witness come forward to say they saw any of this happen?

      2) Rosie talks about terrorists "being parents, too."

      Parents who teach their children at a young age that it is an honor to die for Allah. Have you been watching the news reports about this? The documentaries?

      3) If Bush wasn't President this would be a NONE ISSUE. If Gore was President at the time (and before anyone goes off on this vein please remember that every recount by every news agency (CNN, Newsweek, Time, USA Today, NY Times, BBC, LA Times, etc.) and other independent or political groups still found Bush the winner in Fla. - look it up) do you really think Rosie, Charlie Sheen and other Liberal Democrats would be running this garbage out.

      Reply

      10 Replies

      • 50%

        Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

        4) Rosie says, "radical Christian in the USA are more dangerous than Islamic terrorists."

        Do we read of daily Christian suicide bombers running into crowded squares or public transport blowing themselves up and all around them. Do were hear of daily kidnappings and beheadings in the name of God. Is there a "Christian University" (similiar to the "Muslim University" in Iran) that has trained over a million of America's youth how to be suicide bombers and that there is no greater honor for you or your family than to die in the name of God to kill the infidels.

        Rosie needs to watch who she is supporting with her statements because the true course of Islam is to make it the only religion. Muhhamed cleary stated that life is Jihad and that infidels must convert or die. If we were an Islamic state Rosie would have her children taken away and she and her wife would be jailed or executed for their sexual preference. Think before you speak.

        Reply

        7 Replies

        • 100%

          Hamlet1 year, 6 months ago

          The radical so-called Christian right is using the democratic system to

          1.) legislate away our rights to things like freedom of speech and religion

          2.) change our education system into the laughing stock of the world - as a devout Muslim friend said "My kids know that the world is older than 4,000 years and that nature evolves! They're not ignorant!" Many public schools systems now teach only a religious view of science, hardly preparing our kids for entering universities & the world.

          3.) make torture legal anywhere in the world as long as it is done by Americans, habeus corpus non-existant, and indefinite detention without arrest warrant or access to a lawyer legal for all Americans here at home.

          Mohammed did NOT say that infidels must convert or die.

          Jihad is your struggle to leave this earth a better place than you entered it and it is not permitted to murder people to do that.

          In Arabic what we call suicide bombers are called homocide bombers. e.g. murderers.

          Reply

          6 Replies

          • 100%

            Hamlet1 year, 6 months ago

            There are lots of ways to kill a country, its values and its form of government.

            Getting people to stop asking questions - however silly you think they are - is a good way to make sure democracy dies at the root.

            Our forefather and mothers have died by the thousands for Rosie's right to exist, to talk, to write, and to question.

            If you don't like living in a country where people ask questions, go live in a country where you can't.

            The price of liberty is eternal vigilence - and ol' T. Jefferson did not mean being vigilent AGAINST freedom of speech. He was the same fellow who wrote that a people have the right and duty to overthrow their government if it suppresses their essential rights and freedoms.

            I think it was Ben Franklin who held that the man who would give up his freedoms for a temporary security does not deserve to have them.

            Guys who really walked the walk.

            Or don't they teach that kind of dangerous radicalism in schools anymore?!

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 100%

              Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

              Hamlet:

              There are lots of ways to kill a country. History proves it. Every major power in history has collapsed with the onset of ammorality and corruption in the name of freedom. An anything goes attitude destroys a country from within. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

              It's one thing to ask questions when there are no clear answers but to stir up controversy and conspiracy when there is very clear evidence and explanations that have already answered the questions asked. Ego and ignorance are not a good reason.

              Ol' T. Jefferson was writing in direct support of The Declaration of Indepence and overthrowing ol' King George.

              Ben Franklin was quoting the Bible by the way. You seem to forget these men were Conservative Chrisitans.

              Again, if Bush wasn't pres this would be a none issue. It is a political football not some valid truth seeker crying, "Why?"

              Reply
          • 0%

            torrent291 year, 6 months ago

            That may or not be, but it clearly has nothing to with 911 'truth'

            Reply
          • 100%

            Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

            Hamlet:

            Say what?

            1) Take away freedom of speech and religion? Why is it that liberals groups shout down and attack conservative speakers at college universities? Why does Rosie shout down people who disagree with here on The View? I have seen no legislation outlawing various forms of religion.

            2) Change our education into the laughing stock of the world? Ignorant rants like yours does enough. Schools started in churches in the USA. And a "Devout Muslim" believes that Allah was the god of Abraham and believes in creationism. Read the Koran. And, by Biblical accounts, the world is about 7000 years old. There are no public schools systems teaching only creationism. There are a few teaching it and only as a competing theory.

            3) Legalized torture? What Chrisitan dogma calls for this?

            So all the people Muhammed killed in the name of spreading Islam didn't happen? Read the Koran and history books. It is in there. Homicide bobmbers taught they go to paradise for doing so.

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 100%

              torrent291 year, 6 months ago

              1. Most of the time the person shouted down is Ann Coulter, someone who is universally recognized as not standing in for conservative interests. She is usually the main target, the people who invite her always hide behind the notion that she represents the other side. However, she is a vile woman filled with hatred. Not unlike say Rosie.

              2. Whether or not the Muslim countries teach whatever they want doesnt really matter one way or another. As far as creationism this is serious matter and it has been soundly defeated in every attempt for it to brought up into public schools. In terms of countries that have a good understanding of Evolution the US ranks abyssmally low.

              Reply
          • 100%

            mivan41 year, 6 months ago

            Mesbah is the ultimate hardline extremist calling for a literal following of the Koran including "Make War on the Christians, Jews and infidels for great eternal rewards including 72 virgins and endless wine with no side effects." (Koran Sura 9:5, 29-30, Sura 56.) Hamlet I thought

            you could read it for yourself.Yes many Muslims have been told that Islam is the Religion of Peace. I recently listened to a Muslim that converted to christianity that lived over there; the extremist over ther have said they are after WORLD DOMINATION AND THAT THEY "Will charge

            a head tax" to those who don't convert.

            This convert feels blessed that they have been converted and now know the truth. They also said that many of the Muslims Have been told falsehoods and are not taught to actualy read the Koran, but to blindly follow mostly due to fear. It also is permitted in the Koran to LIE to those

            who are not of the "BOOK". In Christianity lying is a SIN to anyone.

            Reply
      • 100%

        entropy1 year, 6 months ago

        Months and weeks prior to 9/11 there were multiple evacuations for extended periods where everyone had to leave the buildings of time as well as mysterious power outages.

        Bomb sniffing dogs were also pulled from the WTC weeks before 9/11.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsb1R42XzMU

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 100%

          torrent291 year, 6 months ago

          Really bomb sniffing dogs were pulled?

          http://www.portauthoritypolicememorial.org/Sirius press_clipping.htm

          Try again?

          Reply
    • 0%

      entropy1 year, 6 months ago

      The WTC was in fact, as stated by it's designer, designed to withstand multiple jet impacts as well as intense fires.

      http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2001/sep/12/towers...

      Reply

      4 Replies

      • 0%

        protoham1 year, 6 months ago

        The Titanic could not sink either! And you trust a salesman?

        As an Engineer, I was surprised by the fall of the buildings, but then thinking back to how they are constructed, rivets are all that keep it together, they are put in hot and set when they cool, so what would happen if you heated them back up again. POP

        Reply
      • 0%

        torrent291 year, 6 months ago

        http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_707_impact.html

        Not really no from the designer as well:

        "And of course this matters, because the towers did withstand the impact: it's claimed that the combination of that damage and the resulting fires is what brought them down.

        What is clear from Robertson, at least, is that he believes the "robustness of the towers was exemplary", and that "the fact that the structures stood long enough for tens of thousands to escape is a tribute to the many talented men and women who spent endless hours toiling over the design and construction of the project". That is, he appears to be saying the towers performed better than expected, not worse."

        Reply
      • 100%

        Watchman_Dave1 year, 6 months ago

        Prior to 9/11 not one high rise designer took into account that an airliner would stirke the building. There are designed to sway in the wind, some earthquake engineering is done depending on local and maybe some engineering for a small plane crash. To try and account for a commercial jet impact (what size), explosive force and volume of burning fuel wasn't done.

        I haven't meet an construction engineer yet that has ever taken that into account prior to 9/11.

        Designers by the way, design, they turn it over to engineers for the details.

        Reply
      • 100%

        mivan41 year, 6 months ago

        Funny: I listened to The Project Engineer and what he said

        was that it was designed to take the impact of a 707 and not

        a 767. He also said that the effects of the Fuel was NOT taken into account NOR could have it been. He doesn't think

        that they could even figure fuel effects in Design Today. The WTC was his BABY and he is very sickened and downhearted

        about the colapse.

        Reply
  • 100%

    white-pawn1 year, 6 months ago

    Too true.

    Reply
  • 0%

    SamMyam1 year, 6 months ago

    You saw two planes slam into the towers, did you? Hmmm... and where exactly were you? What took you to the towers before the first plane hit?

    also, you "saw" that the planes were loaded with "jet fuel, passengers and Middle Eastern Terrorists" and that it was "at 500 mph"? how did you see that, exactly? is your name Clark Kent?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      torrent291 year, 6 months ago

      And where were you that day?

      Why did every single eyewitness report a plane hitting the Pentagon? And not ONE SINGLE eyewitness report a missile?

      So what proof do you have to the contrary?

      Reply
  • 73%

    GoldRush1 year, 6 months ago

    This is as crazy as the Dipsey Chicks saying they were embarrassed about Bush. Comments without merit, and with political insensitivity deserve response. Clearly the majority of Americans are tired of the hate-filled comments from the liberal left. Ironic that they are generally over-weight and suffer from low self esteem. (Rosie, the fat chick in the Dipsey trio and ...) They need help, until then, they should be protected from making their unintelligent comments. Maybe they have friends? Somebody needs to help women like Rosie and others.

    Reply
• 0%

  contrast1 year, 6 months ago

  To answer you eugene I have looked into this for a while and it is bunk really. Rosie has to do this sort of thing for attention since she isnt funny attractive or talented. thats really it.

  Reply

  5 Replies

  • 0%

    wallyone1 year, 6 months ago

    i don't believe you, you lying neocon..

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 67%

      ramblingwreck1 year, 6 months ago

      Well that is certain to foster civil discourse....congratulations.

      Reply
    • 88%

      torrent291 year, 6 months ago

      Of course you dont, do you even know his politics?

      Trust me, believing that what happened on 911 was a terrorist attack has little to do with political ideology and a lot more to do with not being a sheep and following what a poorly done documentary is leading you to do.

      Reply
  • 0%

    lfergie8121 year, 6 months ago

    contrast

    Well, that's your opinion. Anyone can make a case on limited evidents which is what everyone is doing because all you know is what they want you to know and that's the way it will stay. If the governments story didn't have too many holes in it, the people might have accepted it at face value but when there are issues that are brushed off as CT and not explained, it will continue to be in doubt.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      SamMyam1 year, 6 months ago

      uh huh. so now you're reduced to picking on someone's inability to spell? Like maybe, your own inability to spell "metallurgy" puts you in the moron category as well?

      Reply
• 70%

  wallyone1 year, 6 months ago

  you should follow your own advise.. pin head..

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 100%

    Hamlet1 year, 6 months ago

    Actually, I'd be willing to bet that Rosie can spell better.

    And, as an educator, I would remark that the students who don't ask questions are not by definition the bright ones. They are all too often the ones who learn less. The ones who aren't interested. The ones who follow the crowd and don't want to think independently.

    Any good teacher will tell you:

    There is no such thing as a dumb question.

    There might be some dumb answers.

    Reply
• 0%

  Ranjha1 year, 6 months ago

  Wait a minute. Why is every one bitching with Rosie? She didn't say anything different from what so many others haven't been saying. I think it is the duty of the Government to clear the doubts of those who have been doubting the truthfulness of their story. Confront those Professors, Scientists and Physicists who are doubting you and prove them wrong. Why not?

  Reply

  10 Replies

  • 70%

    lfergie8121 year, 6 months ago

    I agree, instead of calling them fools or idiot, why not go over their points one by one and debate the issues. If it is in fact true that the 9/11 was an attack by radicals in planes without any other help to bring down the buildings, there would be no problem with a closed door debate over evidents. That's why courts have trials because government says one thing and the defense say another.

    Reply

    8 Replies

    • 100%

      ONEMEMPHISDUDE1 year, 6 months ago

      Where were you people schooled, communist Russia? For G_d's sake. If you make an allegation against my character, it's not up to me, in any court of law, to prove my innocence. It's up to YOU to make the case. If you have evidence, present it at a trial, or give it to your favorite Democratic Congressman.

      As the accused, I am not obligated to give you a debate, nor even the time of day. This is why I am so amazed that a loud mouth like Ms. O'Donnell could spew this unsubstantiated rumor on network T.V. Either put up the facts in a court or in Congress, or shut up. The burden of proof is on The Plantiff.

      Reply

      7 Replies

      • 0%

        CaptainShev1 year, 6 months ago

        Wow - so now questioning the government is akin to Communism. This harks riiiiight the way back to the McCarthy era, and we all know how well that turned out.

        No-one's making an allegation against your character. People are asking legitimate questions about holes in the official story - and the story, if it is true, should be able to stand up to questioning. And the truthers would absolutely love this to get as far as a court of law - but seeing as it won't, how about you defend your beliefs?

        Reply

        6 Replies

        • 100%

          torrent291 year, 6 months ago

          Actually people are asking, and this is key here, IGNORANT questions.

          Almost all questions have been answered, if you want them start looking outside of a narrow viewpoint.

          Reply
        • 0%

          CaptainShev1 year, 6 months ago

          I'm sorry, McCarthy was right? What about the unfortunate souls (such as Frances Farmer) who were lobotomised for their suppsed communist sympathies? Were they just collateral damage (I hate that phrase)?

          McCarthyism is widely recognised by the *rest* of the world as a blot on your already badly stained history.

          And if the questions are so ignorant, how come no-one is stepping up to the plate and fielding them with intelligent, well-thought out answers?

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 100%

            CaptainShev1 year, 6 months ago

            Human induced global warming is now only doubted by the oil companies, and, uh, you.

            So come on - tell us the reasons behind all the stock trading the day before, the war games going on, the collapse of WTC 7 (into its own footprint as well, very clever), the near freefall speed of the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, the lack of debris found around the Pentagon (including, wouldn't you know, the aeroplane wings), the sulphite deposits found at Ground Zero, the tapes of commanders forbidding their soldiers from shooting down the planes....

            Feel free to refute any and all of these points....

            Reply
        • 100%

          torrent291 year, 6 months ago

          You've been reading too much Coulter. McCarthy was universally despised by darn near everyone.

          Reply
        • 63%

          ONEMEMPHISDUDE1 year, 6 months ago

          This is true. McCarthy will go down in history as a great American one day. This is a piece of history that we like to ignore. PROVEN history. If The American public would take the time to read recently declassified articles from

          The Soviet Archives, there would be no "progressive/Communist" American party.

          Reply
        • 75%

          ONEMEMPHISDUDE1 year, 6 months ago

          KKKaptain: You can't defend a negative, which is EXACTLY the reason our Courts of Law DEMAND that the burden of proof is on the accuser. You can't conjure it, you can't wish it, you must Prove it!

          Can't get this "legitimate question to a court of Law?" Did you stop to ask..."WHY NOT?" If there is proof..present it in an a charge to a Court. Thus far, no takers. McCarthy era? No Sir. It goes back further than that; to English Common Law.

          Reply
  • 75%

    torrent291 year, 6 months ago

    They have come out and put it forward quite a bit, but the willfully ignorant are convinced of their own rightness and dont listen to fact or reason.

    Reply
• 0%

  david_nwpa1 year, 6 months ago

  Rosie is seeking the truth. She is looking beyond the brevity of the 9/11 commission and asking questions which all of us should ask. I say good luck to her and hope she finds some answers soon.

  Reply

  3 Replies

  • 0%

    SamMyam1 year, 6 months ago

    hmmm... "metalurgy"?

    this from the person who thinks that using the British spelling of "advice" makes one a moron? (smile)

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 0%

      torrent291 year, 6 months ago

      Those who can't use proper capitalization should not be casting any stones on the grammar of others.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        earthlover1 year, 6 months ago

        the only correct way to use english grammer is the britsh way, it is our language and has been since before the usa had caucasians, but we will continue to let you borrow it lol

        Reply
• 0%

  wallyone1 year, 6 months ago

  those that oppose a re-investigation into the attacks of 9/11 should not call themselves patriots.. you are sheep afraid that the truth might come out and king bush and his band of merry men might suffer the rath of the truth movement.. imagine the pres and vice pres getting the death penalty.. puts a smile on my face.

  Reply

  4 Replies

  • 0%

    Zeitgeist1 year, 6 months ago

    "imagine the pres and vice pres getting the death penalty.. puts a smile on my face"

    That is because you are deranged....

    cant swing a truther without hitting a liberal barking moonbat...

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 0%

      lfergie8121 year, 6 months ago

      Now there is one intelligent statement. Insulting the person will make your point right.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        Zeitgeist1 year, 6 months ago

        I'm sorry....I know you want bush dead too...didnt mean to leave you out...

        Reply
  • 50%

    torrent291 year, 6 months ago

    The true sheep are followers of the 'truth' religion, so unswerving in their belief that they are right they have formed a cult.

    What an ignorant and utterly pathetic statement it is to use the word patriot and this phrase "imagine the pres and vice pres getting the death penalty.. puts a smile on my face."

    Perhaps you need to be taught that we are a nation of laws, and those laws do not always conform to the loud yelling and screaming of ignorant masses. Thats what we call a lynch mob. And thats all that the ignorant individuals of the 'truth' movement have become.

    Reply
• 0%

  NoWayMan1 year, 6 months ago

  when you can't attack the message, attack the messenger instead. thats why there are so many personal attacks at rosie (her weight, she's a lesbian, whatever). people just don't want to deal.

  to this day I've wanted someone, anyone, to explain away the "put" options that were bought on Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter (they oppcupied 22 floors of the WTC) in the three days leading up to 911.

  Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter had 2,157 of its "put" options bought in the three trading days before 911.

  That's an average of 719 put options per day.

  Up until September 6, the average number of Morgan Stanley put options sold per day: 27

  thats a 26-fold increase.

  so someone knew in advance that Morgan Stanley's stock was going to fall.

  Reply

  2 Replies

  • 0%

    lfergie8121 year, 6 months ago

    Sounds like a lot more than "someone". LMAO

    Reply
  • 0%

    badnootka1 year, 6 months ago

    If the employees of MorganStanley knew in advance it goes along that other investment houses also knew.. And not a single employee or trader or associate felt compelled to bring this pre-event knowledge to the attention of anyone. They knew this was going to happen and simply sat back and watched in glee as they had already secured their profits. After the fact they were all so pleased with their profits that again even though those profits came at the cost of overt 3000 lives, they felt it was all worth it and we should all continue to coverup the real truth of the incident. Bush did it.

    Reply
• 0%

  Tcaros1 year, 6 months ago

  It's a horrible thing to think that there could be rogues within our own governement that would sponser, provoke, or allow an attack on our home soil in order to restrict our liberties or to get financial gain. It's so horrible to think such a thing could actually happen since we've found in the past that we've done such things on foreign soil. It's horrible to think it could ever happen here.

  What if people were just closing their eyes like the Germans did with the Nazis and believing that if we just kept our mouths shut everything would go back to the way it was before? Scary thoughts for scary times.

  I'm sure some neo con will add the humorous hit and run so I'm going to beat them to the punch. So what if you think we should have limits on our freedoms -you're an idiot.

  Reply
• 0%

  somethingsfishy1 year, 6 months ago

  No doubt, that it is likely,

  there was a second shooter ..

  Reply
• 0%

  100LL1 year, 6 months ago

  and we didn't land on the moon either. my god, netscape has truly fallen from grace...it's eroded into a safe haven for morons.

  hey conspiracy theorists, try this: engage in an intelligent dialog based on all the facts without loosing your cool, or suggesting that your disputant is not part of 'the conspiracy'. also, perhaps you could use logical reason coupled with empirical and direct evidence for once. just once.

  or just go back into your hole and wait for the next major national tragedy to resurface.

  Reply
• 0%

  ONEMEMPHISDUDE1 year, 6 months ago

  That was Voltaire, I believe. He was a Frenchman. (sez it all.) Funny, I've never met a person would fight to the death for someone's right to say something. Apparently the French didn't believe Voltaire either, as they hurriedly welcomed the Nazis into Paris.

  Reply

  4 Replies

  • 0%

    cushi1 year, 6 months ago

    Then try Patrick Henry: "Give me liberty or give me death!" Freedom of speech is a form of liberty, I'm sure. I don't know if I believe the government was involved in 911 or not, but I'm not tearing down those who are asking the awful question. It is their right and their duty if they believe something is amiss.

    Reply
  • 100%

    cushi1 year, 6 months ago

    How about good ole American,Patrick Henry, then: "Give me liberty or give me death!" Freedom of speech falls into the category of "liberty" I do believe! I don't know whether there was government involvement in 911 or not, but I won't malign those who are seeking to find out. It is their right and their duty to keep asking the awful question if they believe something is amiss.

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 75%

      cushi1 year, 6 months ago

      Sorry for the double entry. The first one didn't show up for a while and I thought it hadn't posted.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        ONEMEMPHISDUDE1 year, 6 months ago

        No prob.

        Reply
• 100%

  Tcaros1 year, 6 months ago

  How many wars have the french won? Americans have died for such basic freedoms. This administration has used fear to restrict liberties and enable activities outside of our core beliefs to continue- human rights abuses, abandonment of due process, warrantless eavesdropping.

  I'm not a french basher, but it means more when you can back up your words.

  Reply
• 0%

  MrChin1 year, 6 months ago

  I don't know if there isn't a dumber person on tv.

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 100%

    torrent291 year, 6 months ago

    Bill O Rielly, Charlie Sheen, Ann Coulter regularly appears.

    Theres a whole list of idiots on TV.

    Reply
• 0%

  amazed1 year, 6 months ago

  How can she really say she "questioning" and "seeking answers" when she shouts down anyone within range of her rant?

  Reply
• 0%

  Fiatlux<